Comments on: Warning: time-travel may have dinosaur-related side effects: 100 Million BC

By: Hated it

Hated it — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:17:25 +0000

Redbox should not offer such movies in their boxes.

By: Bryan White

Bryan White — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:30:20 +0000

Congratulations. You’ve been duped by The Asylum.

By: sam jones

sam jones — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:27:31 +0000

wow on christmas ithought it would be awesome wgen i got but it was absolutely krap first of all the leader what was with his voice and it was not his real one and now the dinosaurs the pteranodons were ok but i knew something was wrong when i saw the argentinasaurus why on earth did that guy jump in the water when the plant spat at him the croc and the raptors were krap. what was big red was it a t-rex like it said in the credites of the making. a cacharodonasaurus like that guy said, a giganotosaurus like what wikipedia says or acrocanthosaurus which it looks like. the cover shown a pack of them and a massive dinosaur that wasnt in the movie what the movie grrrrrrrr.

By: Peter Webley

Peter Webley — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:53:07 +0000

The worst film I have ever seen. Period. A sixth former with a campcorder could have done a better job.

By: Stephen Griffin

Stephen Griffin — Fri, 29 May 2009 01:46:30 +0000

I agree. What was the point of setting us all up with the grunts only to have the leader, and then the apparent deputy leader (ie the two with semi-characters) die within 5 minutes, only to be replaced with a band of ragged-trousered troglodytes?

And how on Earth does the whole thing hold water when young Frank goes back to 1950 with the girl after meeting himself (apparently) at some point in the past?

For all the early forboding of the granfather-paradoxesque dialogue, someone needs to watch Back to the Future again. And take screenwriting classes.