<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-Men: First Class, revisionist origins and why I&#8217;m okay with mangling Marvel continuity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinema-suicide.com/2011/06/12/x-men-first-class-revisionist-origins-and-why-im-okay-with-mangling-marvel-continuity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinema-suicide.com/2011/06/12/x-men-first-class-revisionist-origins-and-why-im-okay-with-mangling-marvel-continuity/</link>
	<description>A celebration of cheap thrills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:16:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Christopher Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.cinema-suicide.com/2011/06/12/x-men-first-class-revisionist-origins-and-why-im-okay-with-mangling-marvel-continuity/comment-page-1/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Christopher Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinema-suicide.com/?p=5210#comment-9597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, thank you, thank you. As I think I said on Twitter, I&#039;m having an argument with someone over on GF5 about this flick right now and you have spelled out my argument (or parts of it) better than I did/could.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you, thank you. As I think I said on Twitter, I&#8217;m having an argument with someone over on GF5 about this flick right now and you have spelled out my argument (or parts of it) better than I did/could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nap</title>
		<link>http://www.cinema-suicide.com/2011/06/12/x-men-first-class-revisionist-origins-and-why-im-okay-with-mangling-marvel-continuity/comment-page-1/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Nap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinema-suicide.com/?p=5210#comment-9586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know exactly how you feel, and I couldn&#039;t agree more. X:FC was probably the best Marvel movie I&#039;ve seen to date, and worlds better than any of the other atrocious X-films. I have to admit that I have a special place in my heart for writers that can twist continuity into great story fodder -- for example, consider Grant Morrison&#039;s recent Batman RIP run. 

However, the honest truth is that it&#039;s often more of a burden than anything else, especially in the hands of mediocre writers (which the medium is unfortunately full of). Continuity is important, but it&#039;s not everything. And it should never get in the way of telling a great story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know exactly how you feel, and I couldn&#8217;t agree more. X:FC was probably the best Marvel movie I&#8217;ve seen to date, and worlds better than any of the other atrocious X-films. I have to admit that I have a special place in my heart for writers that can twist continuity into great story fodder &#8212; for example, consider Grant Morrison&#8217;s recent Batman RIP run. </p>
<p>However, the honest truth is that it&#8217;s often more of a burden than anything else, especially in the hands of mediocre writers (which the medium is unfortunately full of). Continuity is important, but it&#8217;s not everything. And it should never get in the way of telling a great story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
